| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Editorial Office |  
top_img
Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery > Volume 38(11); 1995 > Article
Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 1995;38(11): 1683-8.
The Discrimination of Mono-Syllable Words after Noise Stimulation in Listners with Normal Hearing
Kyong-Myong Chon, MD1, Eui-Kyung Goh, MD1, Byeong-Il Park, MD1, Bae-Hyuk Lee, MD1, Jong-Geun Yoon, MD1, Kun-Young Ahn, MD2
1;Department of Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, Pusan National University, Pusan, 2;Department of Otolaryngology, Saint Benedict Hospital, Pusan, Korea
소음부하후 어음명료도의 변화
전경명1 · 고의경1 · 박병일1 · 이배혁1 · 윤종근1 · 안건영2
부산대학교 의과대학 이비인후과학교실1;성분병원 이비인후과2;
ABSTRACT

There is no specific method for treatment of noise induced hearing loss, therefore we can say prevention is the best way. The purpose of this study is to set up the preventive indices for noise-induced hearing loss by investigating discrimination scores of mono-syllable words after noise stimulation. The subjects were 87 persons(43 male, 44 female) whose average hearing level was less than 15dB, especially less than 10dB at 4,000Hz and their speech reception threshold(SRT) was less than 25dB, the discrimination score was 100% in 40dB sensation level(SL) of SRT. The stimulated sounds were narrow band noise of 4,000Hz and white noise. The stimulated intensity was 90dB above the pure tone threshold in each subject. First, noise stimulation was given for 10 minutes, then a speech discrimination score in 40dB SL of SRT and its recovery time was checked immediately after noise stimulation. The results was as follows : 1) Speech discrimination score in 40dB SL was 87.3% after white noise stimulation and 85.6% after narrow band noise. There was statistical difference between white and narrow band noise(p<0.05). 2) There was no statistical difference according to age and sex in speech discrimination score and recovery time after noise stimulation. 3) Subjects who had a speech discrimination score below 76% after white noise stimulation, below 74% after band noise stimulation, and their recovery time over 6 minutes were at risk of developing noise induced hearing loss.

Keywords: Discrimination scoreRecovery timeNoise stimulation.
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Share:      
METRICS
1,053
View
0
Download
Related article
Effect of Repeated Monothermal Caloric Stimulation on the Bithermal Caloric Response.  1997 April;40(4)
Editorial Office
Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
103-307 67 Seobinggo-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul 04385, Korea
TEL: +82-2-3487-6602    FAX: +82-2-3487-6603   E-mail: kjorl@korl.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.                 Developed in M2PI
Close layer
prev next